Ok, whatever, you know what the liberals are going to say about this. Blah blah blah. The first Hispanic justice in a nation that's over 15% Hispanic, the third woman in the court's history in a country that's over 50% woman, a childhood spent in a single-parent family in a housing project, a summa cum laude graduation from Princeton and subsequent distinction at Yale Law School, 17 years in the federal courts, admirers from all across the political spectrum including GHW Bush and Daniel Patrick Moynakhalwian (Alex, I am doing that thing you described where you mash a bunch of keyboard keys at once when you don't know how to spell someone's name). I just hope you all remember that the
nomination of Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court is solely a product of white liberal guilt. The outrage is that her affirmative action-appeasing nomination is trampling on the backs of the truly qualified candidates for the job. Let's take a look at who "Obama" could pick if he wasn't trying to annihilate Western civilization. Here are my top choices.

1.
A Jake/Alex combo - Hey, Mr. President! Looking for someone who can
really bring diversity of experience to the court rather than token appeasement of a special interest group (Latinos)? Nothing says diversity like "two people instead of one".
These men can quote sonnets as easily as they can reference Futurama, can use the term "acedia" as readily as "shit-dicking hungry". Not only are they students of the law, one of them has been recently
arraigned. That's the kind of legal experience that 17 years cloistered in some fusty private club (ie, the federal bench) just can't duplicate. Plus, one of them is a Slav and the other is a redhead. Do you know how many Slavs or redheads have ever sat on the court? I don't.

2.
Michael Savage - What better way to rebuke the British for their
illegal rejection of the First Amendement than to appoint this feisty fighter to the high court? It takes a brave man
to say the following: "You know what autism is? I'll tell you what autism is. In 99 percent of the cases, it's a brat who hasn't been told to cut the act out. That's what autism is. What do you mean they scream and they're silent? They don't have a father around to tell them, "Don't act like a moron. You'll get nowhere in life. Stop acting like a putz. Straighten up. Act like a man. Don't sit there crying and screaming, idiot." That's the kind of valor I want to see in our judicial system. What's that, Britian, you don't like our freedom of speech? Well,
you get AIDS and die, assholes.

3.
The Hubble Space Telescope - You want to talk about duty? You want to talk about service to our country? Sonia Sotomayor might be awfully talented when it comes to judicial activism, but I'd like to see her just
try and float around in space for two decades. Or, to take a picture as
beautiful as this one. Also, the Hubble Space Telescope would be our first NASA instrument justice.
11 comments:
I feel I've been lampooned, or insulted. I guess that's the same thing really.
Think of it as a roast. And no, by the way, any mistakes in the previous post weren't intentional. What were they?
Well Benji, who may have crossed the link using the S**v word....
But not even your libel can deter me in my vote.
✔Jake and Alex
M. Savage
H. Telescope
Thank you! Thank you! I will write the shortest, no-nonsense opinions ever. I will share a vote with Jake, but I want my own chair to sit in.
Limit all your opinions to under fifty words, and supplement them with colorful pictures. It's a lot easier to explain something with pictures.
Did you know? Some people say that a single picture is worth the equivalent of one thousand words.
That's incredible? One thousand?
Michael Savage (real name: Michael Weiner). Google "michael savage" +"ginsburg anus".
Seriously.
What a guy. What a lovely guy.
Thanks for the suggestion. I knew he spent years trumpeting his peripheral association with Ginsburg as a way of getting acceptance within counterculture circles, but that Google search led me to an especially interesting bunch of anecdotes.
Oh yeah, one of the mistakes was using punctuation outside of the quotation marks-- a no-no unless it's a question mark-- also, the excessive use of hyphens (there are specific situations in which they are to be used)-- but then I don't pretend to be a grammar nazi. And possibly some agreement problems,
Oh, you just made basic mistakes --improper use of hyphens and punctuating outside of quotation marks. Also the clause beginning "too, one must admit" is awkward.
It's not like I write properly within the blogosphere, but I remember you making a big deal out of it.
However, it seems the putting a period outside of the marks is a constant with you, Strunk and White would be upset (it is appropriate in some circumstances though).
Post a Comment